![indian gay sex videos public indian gay sex videos public](http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2009/WORLD/asiapcf/06/29/india.antigay/art.india.afp.gi.jpg)
It further said the "majority of the Indian population is not very much affected by the present matter and the proceedings thereof".
![indian gay sex videos public indian gay sex videos public](https://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/5bafc0f3240000510055134e.jpeg)
"In the present matter, neither violation of any fundamental right is involved nor is it in any way one of national importance," it said. The affidavit said the Supreme Court has categorically observed that live streaming is feasible in matters of national importance. It claimed the applicant was attempting to create unnecessary hype on the matter being considered by this court. The affidavit added that granting permission for live streaming in this matter will not serve any purpose and it needs to be agitated by the party on merits and the court to decide on the basis of law and facts and not soliciting or evoking public attention. It said the purpose of the applicants appears to be mala fide as they were trying to get unnecessary publicity and to invite unwanted public attention and every matter that comes before the court is important and for every matter, live streaming may not be feasible and possible. Before allowing live streaming of proceeding appropriate regulatory framework needs to be put in place," the affidavit said. "The instant matter is not a fit case where live streaming of the proceeding is desirable as it affects the cause of administration of justice. The Centre opposed the application and sought its dismissal saying live streaming can be allowed only after the framing of a comprehensive framework by way of rules, including for the protection of data. It sought direction to the high court registry to make arrangements to live stream the final arguments of this case via YouTube or any other platform. The application for live streaming of proceedings was filed in the pending petition of Abhijit Iyer Mitra by Akhilesh Godi, Prasad Raj Dandekar and Shripad Ranade, residents of Karnataka and Mumbai. The court was hearing a batch of petitions filed by several same-sex couples seeking a declaration recognising their marriages under the Special Marriage Act, the Hindu Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act.Ī total of eight petitions have been filed in the high court on the issue. The matter is likely to come up for hearing on Tuesday before a bench of Acting Chief Justice Vipin Sanghi and Justice Navin Chawla. "Comparing India with live streaming of court proceedings in countries like the USA, the UK, Australia, Brazil, China and South Africa is misplaced, so also, the International Court of Justice," the affidavit stated. The social reach of live streaming cannot be a part of the dispensation of justice." "The court does not opt for or seek public appreciation while dealing with matters involving questions of law and facts. Dispensation of justice does not have any bearing on the number of persons who watch the court proceedings or subscribe to the YouTube channel streaming such proceedings, it said.